The calibration wines are very good thing of CMB missing at Vinitaly, for example. It let’s your palate get ready for the big tasting and also sets you right among other judges — since most jury members prefer to discuss the calibration wine in more detail and compare scores. Hence, if you gave a calibration wine 75 points while others gave it 87 — a reason to be alert that you might have a problem with sensing the wines further. This might not even be something you can control — due t sickness or personal factors. As a matter of fact it really helps in critical situations, especially if you’re doing CMB judging for the first time.
Of course, people who sent wine samples to CMB don’t expect that their wine gets worse score because it was first in the flight. So be careful with these fist wines and prepare your mind and senses to possible problems of being too generous or too strict.
Long flights of 10-15 wines can be a problem for a judge especially when they are very similar or far from being good wines. Bad wines wear you out and irritate you fast. Still, it’s your goal not to get overwhelmed by a flight of those — because it’s quite probable that the last wine in this flight will be quite better — and you won’t pay enough attention to notice that.
You don’t have to take others’ opinion into consideration while judging. Still, it’s a good idea to know where you are on the scores. As a newcomer you might not know the usual boundaries of scores and you should know that you score will be eliminated by the system if you judge too strict or too advantageous compared to the others. Still, you will find yourself many times in position when you’re the one who gave a very different score to a wine. No problem here, it’s just you have to be sure that you can objectively support your opinion and that being too strict is not what you do all the time. Points below 75 are very low and should work only for wines with serious flaws, I suppose.
Sometimes you don’t notice the change of the vintage which is stated on your tasting list. Vintage is normally helpful to get ready to a change of wine aromas and taste within the flight and will influence your judging.
Some judges believe that you have to take into consideration the style of winemaking that you think this wine reflects. For me taking into account your educated guesses is not a very good thing, because 1) you always might be wrong 2) you don’t judge wines based on what you think their tipicity to the specific region is. This point is very subjective and unsteady. Regions can produce hundreds of wine styles and it’s not your task to try to guess where the wine comes from. What you think was a Bordeaux blend will come out as a flight of Chinese cab sauvignons and you will not be able to change your score when you discover that after the tasting.
For me the major question for each sample is: does it taste good? Is there a a harmony? Is there a structure, tannin and acidity (for the reds)? I don’t care what region it really is, which country. If the wine tastes good, it gets a good score. Yes, I do take into consideration the style of wine — because pinots are very different from cabernets — but, other than that, I leave the tipicity aside from my judging.
An Interesting question by itself. Sometimes you will find that you have a score in your head right after you tasted the wine — and then trying to give the specific marks to match this score. I really don’t see anything wrong about this — the overall impression is not always easy to divide into its parts. Sometimes I find that summing up all the parts will give a high score which I do not feel tight for the sample. This means you will have to amend your score on the sheet — not always a good idea, especially when there a lot of amendments that you make. As my president told me once — it’s better to spend 30 seconds more with a sample than amending the score afterwards — very true.
Unlike the last Vinitaly competition where the perfect IPad judging technique was successfully presented in 2014, the Concours is still dealing with paper — with all its disadvantages. And the first one on your list will be scores calculation. It’s not officially required to put the score mark on the OIV evaluation sheets, but unofficially you will be doing this in 100% of times — partly to give the medals and partly to correlate yourself with other judges on your panel (“hey, how much did you give this one? 78? Are you kidding?”).
So this is the easy way to know the score without wasting your precious time summing up all the individual segments like intensity, quality, harmony, etc. First you sum up the “perfect scores’. 100 points is of course is when you checked all the maximum boxes. The middle score with the second row of boxes checked is, thus, 86 points (we assume that you will always score the visual evaluation at maximum — almost a rule for every sample — not to judge the wine by its visual presentation). So what you will be mostly summing and subtracting from 86 points for still wines and 87 points for sparklings. So, for example if the wine is quite good and you gave all the scores in the second row — and for example gave a quality rating in the third row — you now just have to deduct 3 points from 86, resulting in 83 score. The same way of fast calculation applies to all other scorings. Saves much tiempo!
During CMB I saw several times when judges take into consideration some “people like it” factor. I dismiss this practice totally — we are not here to give wines scores based on what we think the “crowds might think” about this wine. This is out job as professionals to judge wines strictly with no attention to their probable success in the supermarkets. “I don’t like it, but people’s gonna like it” makes this judgement not yours and not “people’s” because you cannot talk about “people” of the world — in each country there are its own “people” and their choice and opinion you don’t really know.
It’s essential to clear your palate, especially from strong tannic and *bad* wines. The more you drink — the better.
The bread thing is much less useful in my opinion. If you eat bread, don’t forget to clean the mouth with water afterward to remove the crumbs. And yes, bread has taste, so be careful. Personally, I try to avoid eating bread during the tastings at all.
Do not use yourself up. Rest during the breaks. Do some exercises, take some fresh air outside, drink a coffee. During CMB you can even take short breaks during the flight if you’re tired — nobody will normally stop you.
Both reds and whites are normally served at chilly temperatures — which is good for tasting bad bad if you come dressed for the summer. It may be hot outside the venue, but you are going to freeze inside. The last day I was sitting in both a jacket and a light springtime coat. Take some warm clothes with you.
CMB is always held in the spring period where everything is starting to blossom. If you have an allergic reaction to this — judging will be a nightmare, and you can trust me on this one. Take precautions several weeks in advance to fight your condition and take essential meds with you to the tasting. Keeping you nose clean is the most important thing to do, because 80% of judgement comes from smelling the aroma and analysing retronasal vibes coming from the wine when you take a sip and spit.
This is your major source of help and support during CMB. Still, over time you will find that different presidents give different advice, sometimes conflicting each other. You will have to deal with that yourself and use your brain to select the right advice.
It’s always less crowded and more relaxed Especially if you want to get some rest during a long trip to the dining venue.
Your teeth will suffer at first place. Not only literary — but also visually. Red wine will make ‘em, eh, bluish. So — brushing your teeth in the local bathroom is painful but very useful for a good CMB picture!
]]>
Although the organisers declare their statistics calculation system should protect the results from any serious trouble, the taster should come prepared to judge as objective as possible. It shouldn’t matter whether you’re from Sicily, Mendoza or Mexico. Surely, one cannot turn off his palate and historic attraction to our local styles of wine, but defining a good wine and defining the wine “I like” is quite different. Good wine has objective parameters at high levels — such as acidity, intensity, balance and harmony — no matter which wines you like. It’s completely wrong to “recognise» the wines of your region and score them higher, of course. First, you might be wrong. Second, it’s not fair Third, it’s not why we do this job — and it’s a job to be objective.
Judging several very similar wines in a row sometimes require more brain power than judging completely different wines. In my experience a flight of 15 very similar wines requires much more efforts to judge, than 15 wines that are very different. With the similar wines you’re struggling to distinguish the minor differences, unlike the easier task of discovering the bigger ones. For the purpose of self-control and — I assume — the CMB judges selection, the same wine is tasted twice during each day by each of the judges. Although it’s always very uncomfortable to discover that you gave this control wine very different points — one can’t always avoid this due to the mere physiology of wine tasting and the human factors that influence you during the tasting including such as time of the day, place within the flight, closeness to the coffee-break (before, after, how close) and so on. Even the position of your table among the other many tables matters — as well as the distance to the tasting hall entrance. Disturbance from the fellow CMB judges passing and stopping by could be quite severe.
Whether you’re comfortable on your panel of 5 judges or not — this shouldn’t interfere with your judging. Still this question of staying on your own line is complicated for me and it depends a lot on the each panel president and his / her style of judging. One will almost insist that you share your opinion about the wine you’ve just tasted and give you a hint of whether your marks fall in line with those of the other judges, the other will even tell you not to favour or be too strict to the wines. And it’s always a good idea — as a judge you should know that if you’re the only one on the panel who gives wines low scores your rating will perhaps be eliminated. Which means you’re a useless on this “celebration of life” — a white crow, so to speak.
It’s always something you can learn during CMB tastings. Although it’s officially not welcomed if the panel members discuss the wines, the fact is that it’s almost unavoidable. Even if we were completely silent during the judging — the body language will tell you a lot about others’ opinion of the wine. That’s especially true, if you’re well connected to the other panel members. And it’s almost 100% true for the panel president that faces you all the time during the competition. You see the impression of each and every wine on their face, depending on the nationality could be from subtle to very obvious. You could even guess a score the panel head gives to a wine! Still, this is crucial for a newcomer to learn the boundaries of scores and the rules of judging the wines. Organises probably assume you know all about that from your first time, but it’s far from being the truth — this is from my own experience during the first time at CMB several years ago.
Whether you are suffering from the allergy, influenza or just an ordinary hangover — you go out there every fucking morning and you get yourself to taste another 50 samples. You nose might not work properly — just get on the pills and nasal sprays. Pro taster will rather die than skip the tasting.
It’s the last tasting day, you’re fed up and it’s just 30 min left to end the show. At this very moment your jury bumps into three faulty wines in a row — cork, oxidation, whatever. “Gosh”,- you think, — “not now, please!” The desire to simply dismiss the wine and finish the freaking day hits against a pro-taster’s motivation and the ruddy professionalism. Second (and sometimes third) samples are called for — no way you will put your comfort ahead of your professionalism.
It’s always less crowded and more relaxed. Especially if you want to get some rest during a long trip to the dining venue.